Your page rank:

Total word count: 1987
Pages: 7
Listen This

Calculate the Price

- -
275 words
Looking for Expert Opinion?
Let us have a look at your work and suggest how to improve it!
Get a Consultant


The Olympic park Munich Is located in Munich, Germany. This Olympic park was built for the 1972 Summer Olympics. The Menu of urban transformation experienced by capitals in the industrialized world through the 20th century has mainly revolved around celebrations of urban mega events. Olympic Park Munich is an obvious example of these processes.  The architects Frei Otto and Gunther Behnisch collaborated in building and designing the stadium to host the Olympic Games in 1972 in Munich (Behnisch, 2003). They elevated a lightweight construction where tensions are nullified by a system of cables and support, allowing both new ways and economy. They spearheaded the utilization of scientific estimations in light of computational methodology to decide the shape and behavior of the surface of the cover. Otto needed to adjust their plan to the preconceived form of the park. The Recreation center keeps on filling in as a scene for social, social, and religious occasions, for example, occasions of worship.

1.1 Section 1

1.2 History

Frei Otto was the modeler best known for the tremendous rooftop coverings designed for the 1972 Olympics in Munich. He made a fine art of his tent-like developments, which brought a feeling of light and openness to open structures. His work was propelled by normal natural structures, including spider webs, trees and skeletons. According to Bachman, (2004) he once said “Everything man is doing in design is to attempt to conflict with nature, obviously we need to comprehend nature to know how far we need to conflict with nature.” ’Visionary planner’ and ‘titan of present day design’ Otto was perceived by the Prize jury for his spearheading rooftop structures and community-oriented methods for working.

In 1916, Berlin was chosen to have the VI Olympic Games; however, the occasion was suspended for the start of World War II. The city was remunerated in 1936 to have the eleventh version of the Games, the last before the long break brought about by the episode of World War II and set apart by eminent war conditions. In 1972, the respect was granted to another German city, Munich, far and warlike climate around the Recreations were eclipsed this time by a terrorist attack. The idea of a “green Olympic Games” was picked, thus too was the introduction toward the standards of majority rules system (Ching, 2014). Authorities tried to incorporate idealism toward the future with an uplifting disposition toward innovation, and in this manner put aside recollections of the past, for example, the Olympic Games of 1936 in Berlin. The engineering firm of Günther Behnisch and its accomplices built up a far-reaching all-inclusive strategy for the games and recreation zone, which was under development from 1968 until 1972. The eye-catching tensile structure that spreads a great part of the recreation center was planned by German designer and specialist Frei Otto with Günther Behnisch.

2 Experimental pavilion

World’s Fairs, Olympic Games and Grand Expositions are recognized as demonstrating justification for experimental engineering. The centerpiece structures at these settings are intended to awe their universal onlookers with specialized and aesthetical style. In a way, they go about as ministers of the host nation’s dynamic industry (Powell, 2011). The appliance of both brave materials and brave systems are along these lines compulsory. The Munich stadium complex for the 1972 Summer Olympics is an immaculate case of how site and structure can mix. Undulating rooftops and drastically etched earths capes bind together the setting (WikiArquitectura, 2017). Both inside the lobbies and out among the recreation center setting guests are given a modern arrangement of encounters.

2.1 Functional requirements

The first prerequisites, as enforced by the Olympic Committee, were clear at the time. No under 80,000 seats ought to be given in the primary stadium, and a littler encased games corridor and swimming lobby ought to likewise be given (Jones & Canniffe, 2012). Different offices ought to incorporate a warm-up field and an encased exercise office. The nearby Olympic Town ought to give lodging to 3,000 individuals and the fundamental bolster capacities. These offices were to be of changeless quality and convertible to open use and parkland after the three-week Olympic amusements. Specifically, the competition utilized the aphorism “Olympics in the Green”.

2.2 Site

At the point when the Olympic Board of committee granted the 1972 Olympic Games to Munich in 1966, the city had no expansive games fields. Past arranging however had officially chosen he best site for the new office, a vacant tract of land around three miles north of focal Munich (Jones & Canniffe, 2012). The site was initially the setting of a 1930’s runway, a previous preparing ground for the Bavarian Imperial Armed force and the site of Munich’s first considerate airplane terminal. Amid the cleanup after the Second World War, the ground had been utilized as a dump yard for destroyed structures’ rubble. In addition, a 300m tall communicate tower, which is yet present today, is a noteworthy point of interest of the site.

3           Section 2

3.1         Conceptual phase

Through its arranging, improvement and current observation, the park figures out how to set a few keynotes. To begin with, the tensile structure and translucent skin were progressive at the time and stay both outwardly and actually amazing today. The official language as it was translated by drafters Frei Otto and accomplices is a solid proclamation about Germany and its modern abilities (, 2017). As the entire park has been built on a relinquished landing strip secured with remainders of the war, the city has recovered a vital green range. In spite of what happens to numerous other setting lobbies, the entire complex has been put to perpetual use when the basic role had been served: it has now turned into a games stadium, and an often-visited spot with an attention on games.

3.2  Critical technical issues

A stadium of Olympic significance ought to react with relating regard for the essential capacities it has. Orientation to wind and sun needs to guarantee evenhanded open-air conditions for all contenders. Besides, convenience and transport ought to be accommodating a large number of guests (, 2017). Uncommon conditions vigorously affected outline thinking. Two inquiries ruled this venture. The principal issue that emerged was speed of development. Due dates were absolute and the course of events for building up the enormous site (counting the Olympic Town) was short. Speed of development and the danger of postponements would need to be considered. Second, what might happen to the complex after the Olympics? Given the expenses related with such an amazing event and the broad offices that would remain, their future utilize must be intended for. A transitory structure would be inadequate, and a momentous one would be an unending weight.

A third prerequisite rose amid a later stage, and considered necessities of broadcast color TV. TV would have its say; since the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, live shading TV scope had turned into the standard and had widely infiltrated the market. The TV organizations had necessities towards lighting, shadow decrease, and acoustics.

4 Climate

Notwithstanding Munich’s mild climate, the project of a cable net rooftop structure needed to address two basic elements: wind and snow. Solidifying precipitation, snow or hail falls a normal of 74 days for every year in Munich, and wind spouts can surpass 120 km/h amid stormy climate (Jones & Canniffe, 2012). Overwhelming snow and ice aggregations on the unheated rooftop could force hazardous basic burdens. Fundamentally, this issue could be settled by putting expansive fans under the covering to soften snow off the top. This system had a demonstrated record in the Otto’s German Structure at the 1967 World Fair in Montreal.

Given the atmosphere conditions in Munich and particularly the predominant wind course, both the pliable rooftop and the primary seating territory are situated at the western edge. Roughly, 66% of the stadium’s guests are accordingly given asylum from the normal components (Kroll, 2017). The rooftop and the higher seating territory on the western side likewise ensure the eastern seats to be fairly more shielded from wind. By and by, in present Olympic stadiums, a revealed seating range would not be permitted any longer.

4.1 Roof

Without uncertainty, the most noteworthy element of the stadium and the contiguous structures is the tensile rooftop structure. It has turned out to be not just a historic point for the city of Munich, however has been a point of reference for some more developments in this field of study in later years (Macdonald, 2007). It is particularly the size and the greatness of the rooftop, which has roused numerous planners and creators. The rooftop matrix over the primary stadium is framed by nine saddle-molded nets of 25-millimeter steel cables separated in a 763mm square matrix. The seat traverses up to 60m and achieves a greatest stature of 55m. The nets are upheld over the seating regions by eight decreasing poles behind the stadium, running from 51 to 71m high. Littler bow-formed nets interface the bigger films and wrap around the supporting poles (, 2017).

The cable nets are doubly bended. The subsequent twofold bended seat shape keeps the shelters from effortlessly vacillating in the wind. The aggregate length of steel cable in the complex surpasses 409km and tension loads in the cable net are as much as 5500 tons. Initially the establishment configuration was proposed to comprise of restressed anchors (Leonhardt & Otto, 1976). Local code authorities however demanded more preservationist docks to give soundness. Now and again, these docks are as much as 20m deep and 5m wide. These huge establishments were required to oppose the huge tensile worries in the cable system and the live loads forced by winds crosswise over and under the open structures.

4.2 Envelope

Initially one expected to hang a canvas texture underneath the cable net, similarly as Otto did in Montreal. As TV organizations became distinctly included in any case, the issue of over the top complexity for communicates, photography proposed adjustment. At last, bronze-tinted acrylic plastic boards measuring two, nine by two, nine meters were introduced over the cable wires (, 2017). Associations between the boards needed to take into account thermal expansion and basic development of up to 2m diversion under overwhelming wind loads. The acrylic panels were joined to the supporting net at the convergence point of the cables. Nonetheless, due to the abnormality of the net, the panels sometimes overlaid the cable lattice at different edges. Aside from offering enough color contrast for enhanced photography, the bronze tinting additionally lessened heat gain and glare without giving shadows as a canvas shelter would have.

4.3 Experimenting

Since this venture has been executed before our current advanced age, the majority of the estimations had been finished by hand. The vast majority of the building was additionally the aftereffect of functional trials, for the most part led by Frei Otto himself, and in light of models in fluctuating scales (Krier &Vorreiter, 1988). Otto began with models of the rooftop at a 1:125 scale. He gauged the mechanical powers in the individual wires of the net with gages he had created himself. A few settled cameras recorded both the stacked and emptied state of the model for similar estimations. When these investigations offered the fundamental knowledge in how these developments functioned and responded, bigger models were manufactured and hand figuring were performed for check. In this way, modelers and specialists utilized drawings on a 1:10 scale, bringing about 3.800 sqm of drawings

5 Conclusion

Think about Munich’s best-known marvels, and the Olympic park will undoubtedly tally as a part of them. The forcing Olympic Tower takes off over Munich’s horizon, giving an unmistakable point of interest to each one of the individuals who visit the city or live in. In reality, the clearing shelter of the Olympic Stadium rooftop is one of Europe’s most bizarre compositional structures. Today the site is the greatest games stop in Europe, drawing in a huge number of guests every year. Nevertheless, even without a particular event, the Olympic park seldom neglects to awe. At best, guests can appreciate wonderful perspectives of Munich and the Alps from the Olympic Tower’s 189-meter-high survey stage or while eating a meal in the tower’s rotating eatery.

Share This

More essays like this

Lego and Social Responsibility

ContentsIntroduction2 Experimental pavilion3           Section 24 Climate5 Conclusion Lego is a plastic toy manufacturing company owned by the Lego group. It ...

Read more


ContentsIntroduction2 Experimental pavilion3           Section 24 Climate5 Conclusion Strategic Approach and Performance of the LEGO Organizations Background LEGO is a plastic ...

Read more

The Lego Group

ContentsIntroduction2 Experimental pavilion3           Section 24 Climate5 Conclusion The Lego Group is a family-owned Danish toy making company which has its ...

Read more

Unfinished tasks keep piling up?

Let us complete them for you. Quickly and professionally.

Check Price

Successful message